view docs/man3/SDL_JoyBallEvent.3 @ 1166:da33b7e6d181

Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:25:10 +0100 From: Dirk Mueller Subject: [PATCH] build SDL with nonexecutable stack libSDL is by default marked with an executable stack, which it doesn't actually need. the reason for this is that there are assembler files in the source tree not properly annotated with the "noexec stack" section. As such the linker does a safe-fallback and marks the whole lib as "requires executable stack". the patch below removes this by adding annotations. As far as I can see it shouldn't break anything.
author Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org>
date Tue, 01 Nov 2005 23:19:59 +0000
parents e5bc29de3f0a
children 546f7c1eb755
line wrap: on
line source

.TH "SDL_JoyBallEvent" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 22:59" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" 
.SH "NAME"
SDL_JoyBallEvent\- Joystick trackball motion event structure
.SH "STRUCTURE DEFINITION"
.PP
.nf
\f(CWtypedef struct{
  Uint8 type;
  Uint8 which;
  Uint8 ball;
  Sint16 xrel, yrel;
} SDL_JoyBallEvent;\fR
.fi
.PP
.SH "STRUCTURE DATA"
.TP 20
\fBtype\fR
\fBSDL_JOYBALLMOTION\fP
.TP 20
\fBwhich\fR
Joystick device index
.TP 20
\fBball\fR
Joystick trackball index
.TP 20
\fBxrel\fR, \fByrel\fR
The relative motion in the X/Y direction
.SH "DESCRIPTION"
.PP
\fBSDL_JoyBallEvent\fR is a member of the \fI\fBSDL_Event\fR\fR union and is used when an event of type \fBSDL_JOYBALLMOTION\fP is reported\&.
.PP
A \fBSDL_JOYBALLMOTION\fP event occurs when a user moves a trackball on the joystick\&. The field \fBwhich\fR is the index of the joystick that reported the event and \fBball\fR is the index of the trackball (for a more detailed explaination see the \fIJoystick section\fR)\&. Trackballs only return relative motion, this is the change in position on the ball since it was last polled (last cycle of the event loop) and it is stored in \fBxrel\fR and \fByrel\fR\&.
.SH "SEE ALSO"
.PP
\fI\fBSDL_Event\fR\fR, \fIJoystick Functions\fR, \fI\fBSDL_JoystickEventState\fP\fR, \fI\fBSDL_JoystickGetBall\fP\fR
...\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 22:59