Mercurial > sdl-ios-xcode
view docs/man3/SDL_VideoModeOK.3 @ 4431:d660ca4f7b1f SDL-1.2
Fixed bug 944
Tatu Kilappa 2010-02-11 12:13:20 PST
When compiling with -Wconversion, gcc complains about a cast in SDL_endian.h
that might change the result as we are casting from an int into an Uint16. This
is of course not visible unless we are on a non-x86 platform where the
assembler is not available.
While it's not really an error, the warning is really annoying. To fix, change
SDL_endian.h line 87 to:
return(Uint16)((x<<8)|(x>>8));
Thank you.
author | Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:46:10 -0700 |
parents | 1238da4a7112 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
.TH "SDL_VideoModeOK" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" .SH "NAME" SDL_VideoModeOK \- Check to see if a particular video mode is supported\&. .SH "SYNOPSIS" .PP \fB#include "SDL\&.h" .sp \fBint \fBSDL_VideoModeOK\fP\fR(\fBint width, int height, int bpp, Uint32 flags\fR); .SH "DESCRIPTION" .PP \fBSDL_VideoModeOK\fP returns \fB0\fR if the requested mode is not supported under any bit depth, or returns the bits-per-pixel of the closest available mode with the given width, height and requested \fIsurface\fR flags (see \fI\fBSDL_SetVideoMode\fP\fR)\&. .PP The bits-per-pixel value returned is only a suggested mode\&. You can usually request and bpp you want when \fIsetting\fR the video mode and SDL will emulate that color depth with a shadow video surface\&. .PP The arguments to \fBSDL_VideoModeOK\fP are the same ones you would pass to \fISDL_SetVideoMode\fR .SH "EXAMPLE" .PP .nf \f(CWSDL_Surface *screen; Uint32 bpp; \&. \&. \&. printf("Checking mode 640x480@16bpp\&. "); bpp=SDL_VideoModeOK(640, 480, 16, SDL_HWSURFACE); if(!bpp){ printf("Mode not available\&. "); exit(-1); } printf("SDL Recommends 640x480@%dbpp\&. ", bpp); screen=SDL_SetVideoMode(640, 480, bpp, SDL_HWSURFACE); \&. \&.\fR .fi .PP .SH "SEE ALSO" .PP \fI\fBSDL_SetVideoMode\fP\fR, \fI\fBSDL_GetVideoInfo\fP\fR .\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01