Mercurial > sdl-ios-xcode

view docs/man3/SDL_LockSurface.3 @ 1544:ab1e4c41ab71

Find changesets by keywords (author, files, the commit message), revision number or hash, or revset expression.
Fixed bug #33 Mike Frysinger wrote: > with libsdl-1.2.9, some games (like bomberclone) started > segfaulting in Gentoo [...snip...] > the last change in the last hunk: [...snip...] > if i change the statement to read: > (table[which].blit_features & GetBlitFeatures()) == GetBlitFeatures() > bomberclone no longer segfaults on my box Alex Volkov wrote: > The test "(table[which].blit_features & GetBlitFeatures()) == > table[which].blit_features)" is correct, and the previous > "(table[which].cpu_mmx == SDL_HasMMX())" was actually broken. I think there is potentially a slightly different cause of the above problem. During the introduction of the Altivec code, the blit_table struct field 'alpha' got changed from a straightforward enum to a bitmask, which makes perfect sense by itself. However, now the table driven blitter selection code in SDL_CalculateBlitN() can choose the wrong blitters when searching for a NO_ALPHA blitter because of the following code: int a_need = 0; ... (a_need & table[which].alpha) == a_need && When searching through the normal_blit_2[] table, a SET_ALPHA blitter (like Blit_RGB565_ARGB8888) can now be selected instead of a NO_ALPHA one, causing alpha channel bits to appear in a non-alpha destination surface. I suppose this could theoretically be an indirect cause of the segfault mentioned above. I *think* this can be fixed by changing to int a_need = NO_ALPHA;
author Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org>
date Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:47:49 +0000
parents e5bc29de3f0a
children 546f7c1eb755
line wrap: on
line source

.TH "SDL_LockSurface" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" 
.SH "NAME"
SDL_LockSurface\- Lock a surface for directly access\&.
.SH "SYNOPSIS"
.PP
\fB#include "SDL\&.h"
.sp
\fBint \fBSDL_LockSurface\fP\fR(\fBSDL_Surface *surface\fR);
.SH "DESCRIPTION"
.PP
\fBSDL_LockSurface\fP sets up a surface for directly accessing the pixels\&. Between calls to \fBSDL_LockSurface\fP and \fBSDL_UnlockSurface\fP, you can write to and read from \fBsurface->\fBpixels\fR\fR, using the pixel format stored in \fBsurface->\fBformat\fR\fR\&. Once you are done accessing the surface, you should use \fBSDL_UnlockSurface\fP to release it\&.
.PP
Not all surfaces require locking\&. If \fBSDL_MUSTLOCK\fP(\fBsurface\fR) evaluates to \fB0\fR, then you can read and write to the surface at any time, and the pixel format of the surface will not change\&. 
.PP
No operating system or library calls should be made between lock/unlock pairs, as critical system locks may be held during this time\&.
.PP
It should be noted, that since SDL 1\&.1\&.8 surface locks are recursive\&. This means that you can lock a surface multiple times, but each lock must have a match unlock\&. 
.PP
.nf
\f(CW    \&.
    \&.
    SDL_LockSurface( surface );
    \&.
    /* Surface is locked */
    /* Direct pixel access on surface here */
    \&.
    SDL_LockSurface( surface );
    \&.
    /* More direct pixel access on surface */
    \&.
    SDL_UnlockSurface( surface );
    /* Surface is still locked */
    /* Note: Is versions < 1\&.1\&.8, the surface would have been */
    /* no longer locked at this stage                         */
    \&.
    SDL_UnlockSurface( surface );
    /* Surface is now unlocked */
    \&.
    \&.\fR
.fi
.PP
.SH "RETURN VALUE"
.PP
\fBSDL_LockSurface\fP returns \fB0\fR, or \fB-1\fR if the surface couldn\&'t be locked\&.
.SH "SEE ALSO"
.PP
\fI\fBSDL_UnlockSurface\fP\fR
...\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01