Fixed bug #33 Mike Frysinger wrote: > with libsdl-1.2.9, some games (like bomberclone) started > segfaulting in Gentoo [...snip...] > the last change in the last hunk: [...snip...] > if i change the statement to read: > (table[which].blit_features & GetBlitFeatures()) == GetBlitFeatures() > bomberclone no longer segfaults on my box Alex Volkov wrote: > The test "(table[which].blit_features & GetBlitFeatures()) == > table[which].blit_features)" is correct, and the previous > "(table[which].cpu_mmx == SDL_HasMMX())" was actually broken. I think there is potentially a slightly different cause of the above problem. During the introduction of the Altivec code, the blit_table struct field 'alpha' got changed from a straightforward enum to a bitmask, which makes perfect sense by itself. However, now the table driven blitter selection code in SDL_CalculateBlitN() can choose the wrong blitters when searching for a NO_ALPHA blitter because of the following code: int a_need = 0; ... (a_need & table[which].alpha) == a_need && When searching through the normal_blit_2[] table, a SET_ALPHA blitter (like Blit_RGB565_ARGB8888) can now be selected instead of a NO_ALPHA one, causing alpha channel bits to appear in a non-alpha destination surface. I suppose this could theoretically be an indirect cause of the segfault mentioned above. I *think* this can be fixed by changing to int a_need = NO_ALPHA;

.TH "SDL_Delay" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" 
.SH "NAME"
SDL_Delay\- Wait a specified number of milliseconds before returning\&.
.SH "SYNOPSIS"
.PP
\fB#include "SDL\&.h"
.sp
\fBvoid \fBSDL_Delay\fP\fR(\fBUint32 ms\fR);
.SH "DESCRIPTION"
.PP
Wait a specified number of milliseconds before returning\&. \fBSDL_Delay\fP will wait at \fIleast\fP the specified time, but possible longer due to OS scheduling\&.
.PP
.RS
\fBNote:  
.PP
Count on a delay granularity of \fIat least\fP 10 ms\&. Some platforms have shorter clock ticks but this is the most common\&.
.RE
.SH "SEE ALSO"
.PP
\fI\fBSDL_AddTimer\fP\fR
...\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01