view test/picture.xbm @ 1626:a80e1e0880b8

Fixed bug #176 [I'm fixing this for the public headers, but I'm not going to bother for the SDL library code (yet)] To clarify: Normaly, GCC (or, to be precise, the preprocessor) will ignore this, and compile the code happily. However, one can specify -Wundef to get a warning about this. One can probably argue whether to consider this a bug or not; but I think that (a) from a semantic point of view, using "#if FOO" when FOO is not defined is strange, and (b) since it is possible to trigger a warning about this, and a trivial fix exists, it should be corrected. I can think of two alternative patches, BTW: 1) Simply use #define HAVE_FOO 0, instead of not defining HAVE_FOO at all 2) Change #if HAVE_FOO to #if HAVE_FOO+0 which always does the right thing. But I think I still prefer the attached patch :-).
author Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org>
date Thu, 13 Apr 2006 13:38:40 +0000
parents 74212992fb08
children
line wrap: on
line source

#define picture_width 32
#define picture_height 32
static char picture_bits[] = {
   0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x18, 0x80, 0x01, 0x18,
   0x64, 0x6f, 0xf6, 0x26, 0x0a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x50, 0xf2, 0xff, 0xff, 0x4f,
   0x14, 0x04, 0x00, 0x28, 0x14, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x28, 0x10, 0x32, 0x00, 0x08,
   0x94, 0x03, 0x00, 0x08, 0xf4, 0x04, 0x00, 0x08, 0xb0, 0x08, 0x00, 0x08,
   0x34, 0x01, 0x00, 0x28, 0x34, 0x01, 0x00, 0x28, 0x12, 0x00, 0x40, 0x48,
   0x12, 0x20, 0xa6, 0x48, 0x14, 0x50, 0x11, 0x29, 0x14, 0x50, 0x48, 0x2a,
   0x10, 0x27, 0xac, 0x0e, 0xd4, 0x71, 0xe8, 0x0a, 0x74, 0x20, 0xa8, 0x0a,
   0x14, 0x20, 0x00, 0x08, 0x10, 0x50, 0x00, 0x08, 0x14, 0x00, 0x00, 0x28,
   0x14, 0x00, 0x00, 0x28, 0xf2, 0xff, 0xff, 0x4f, 0x0a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x50,
   0x64, 0x6f, 0xf6, 0x26, 0x18, 0x80, 0x01, 0x18, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
   0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00};