view docs/man3/SDL_mutexV.3 @ 3908:6e41f5d80198 SDL-1.2

Actually, this is dumb, just simplify this for now. (But what if this finds the wrong symbol? We really should make this a ./configure test and only do one dlsym or the other depending on the platform...) Reference Bugzilla #354. --ryan.
author Ryan C. Gordon <icculus@icculus.org>
date Sat, 03 Feb 2007 08:17:12 +0000
parents e5bc29de3f0a
children 546f7c1eb755
line wrap: on
line source

.TH "SDL_mutexV" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" 
.SH "NAME"
SDL_mutexV\- Unlock a mutex
.SH "SYNOPSIS"
.PP
\fB#include "SDL\&.h"
#include "SDL_thread\&.h"
.sp
\fBint \fBSDL_mutexV\fP\fR(\fBSDL_mutex *mutex\fR);
.SH "DESCRIPTION"
.PP
Unlocks the \fBmutex\fR, which was previously created with \fI\fBSDL_CreateMutex\fP\fR\&. Returns \fB0\fR on success, or \fB-1\fR on an error\&.
.PP
SDL also defines a macro \fB#define SDL_UnlockMutex(m) SDL_mutexV(m)\fP\&.
.SH "SEE ALSO"
.PP
\fI\fBSDL_CreateMutex\fP\fR, \fI\fBSDL_mutexP\fP\fR
...\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01