Mercurial > sdl-ios-xcode
view docs/man3/SDL_WM_GetCaption.3 @ 1303:52b5afd7ecee
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 21:43:26 +1000
From: Sean Childs
Subject: [SDL] Compiling SDL 1.2.8 with the free Borland compiler
When compiling SDL 1.2.8 with the free Borland compiler, I received this
error (there is a similar error that occurs in
src\video\windx5\sdl_dx5events.c):
Error E2342 ..\..\src\video\windib\sdl_dibevents.c 189: Type mismatch in
parameter 'lpPrevWndFunc' (wanted 'int (__stdcall *)()', got 'long
(__stdcall *)(void *,unsigned int,unsigned int,long)') in function
DIB_HandleMessage
I checked the MSDN library at:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/winui/winui/
windowsuserinterface/windowing/windowprocedures/windowprocedurereference/wind
owprocedurefunctions/callwindowproc.asp
and it had this to say:
If STRICT is not defined, the lpPrevWndFunc parameter has the data type
FARPROC. The FARPROC type is declared as follows:
int (FAR WINAPI * FARPROC) ()
In C, the FARPROC declaration indicates a callback function that has an
unspecified parameter list. In C++, however, the empty parameter list in
the declaration indicates that a function has no parameters. This subtle
distinction can break careless code. Following is one way to handle this
situation:
#ifdef STRICT
WNDPROC MyWindowProcedure
#else
FARPROC MyWindowProcedure
#endif
...
lResult = CallWindowProc(MyWindowProcedure, ...)
author | Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:30:42 +0000 |
parents | e5bc29de3f0a |
children | 546f7c1eb755 |
line wrap: on
line source
.TH "SDL_WM_GetCaption" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" .SH "NAME" SDL_WM_GetCaption\- Gets the window title and icon name\&. .SH "SYNOPSIS" .PP \fB#include "SDL\&.h" .sp \fBvoid \fBSDL_WM_GetCaption\fP\fR(\fBchar **title, char **icon\fR); .SH "DESCRIPTION" .PP Set pointers to the window \fBtitle\fR and \fBicon\fR name\&. .SH "SEE ALSO" .PP \fI\fBSDL_WM_SetCaption\fP\fR, \fI\fBSDL_WM_SetIcon\fP\fR ...\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01