view docs/man3/SDL_CreateMutex.3 @ 561:4bcf7dd06c47

Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 13:33:05 -0500 From: Darrell Walisser Subject: Re: crash in SDL / OSX > Yes, compose keys and other "dead" keys should have unicode 0. > As a hack, if you get multiple composed characters, you can send the > sequence with a valid unicode and a keysym of 0. It's because of > things like this that I'm separating the key and char events in SDL 2.0 I've done this and here's the patch.
author Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org>
date Sun, 15 Dec 2002 09:09:31 +0000
parents e5bc29de3f0a
children 546f7c1eb755
line wrap: on
line source

.TH "SDL_CreateMutex" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:00" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" 
.SH "NAME"
SDL_CreateMutex\- Create a mutex
.SH "SYNOPSIS"
.PP
\fB#include "SDL\&.h"
#include "SDL_thread\&.h"
.sp
\fBSDL_mutex *\fBSDL_CreateMutex\fP\fR(\fBvoid\fR);
.SH "DESCRIPTION"
.PP
Create a new, unlocked mutex\&.
.SH "EXAMPLES"
.PP
.nf
\f(CWSDL_mutex *mut;

mut=SDL_CreateMutex();
\&.
\&.
if(SDL_mutexP(mut)==-1){
  fprintf(stderr, "Couldn\&'t lock mutex
");
  exit(-1);
}
\&.
/* Do stuff while mutex is locked */
\&.
\&.
if(SDL_mutexV(mut)==-1){
  fprintf(stderr, "Couldn\&'t unlock mutex
");
  exit(-1);
}

SDL_DestroyMutex(mut);
\fR
.fi
.PP
.SH "SEE ALSO"
.PP
\fI\fBSDL_mutexP\fP\fR, \fI\fBSDL_mutexV\fP\fR, \fI\fBSDL_DestroyMutex\fP\fR
...\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:00