Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:20:25 +0200 From: Joost Baas Subject: why call arts artsc? I, and a few other people at the mplayer-docs-mailinglist were wondering why you decided to call arts artsc. I understand usually users have nothing to do with libsdl, just developers, but because you can choose the audio-driver being used by mplayer, one of which is sdl, and you can also choose the sdl subdriver, it is necessary to have a well-known or logical name. artsc is not the logical choice, and it's very hard to look up the right name if you don't know what you're looking for.

#!/bin/sh
#
# libtool assumes that the compiler can handle the -fPIC flag
# This isn't always true (for example, nasm can't handle it)
command=""
while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
    case "$1" in
        -?PIC)
            # Ignore -fPIC and -DPIC options
            ;;
        *)
            command="$command $1"
            ;;
    esac
    shift
done
echo $command
exec $command