Mercurial > sdl-ios-xcode
view src/thread/dc/SDL_syscond.c @ 1524:38a12fd1a2c1
Fixed bug #46
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:09:45 -0500
From: mhall4400 vipmail kvcc edu
Subject: Possible SDL bug
Greetings
I believe Ive come across a bug in your SDL product (1.2.9), in the CD-ROM
control portion of the library.
When calling the SDL_CDPlay() function to play the last track of a CD using the
offset and length from an SDL_CD structure generated by SDL_CDOpen(), I get the
following error from a call to SDL_Error():
mciSendCommand() error: The specified parameter is out of range for the
specified command.
The code returning the error is:
SDL_CDPlay(g_playingDriveSDLCD,
g_playingDriveSDLCD->track[trackNumberInt].offset,
g_playingDriveSDLCD->track[trackNumberInt].length)
Subtracting one from the length of the provided length seems to repair the
problem:
SDL_CDPlay(g_playingDriveSDLCD,
g_playingDriveSDLCD->track[trackNumberInt].offset,
(g_playingDriveSDLCD->track[trackNumberInt].length) - 1)
Ive replicated this problem on Windows 98 SE (several months since last
patch), fully-patched Window ME, seldom-patched Windows XP SP1, and
fully-patched Windows XP SP2.
While investigating the issue, I came across a line in your librarys win32
source code in file \src\cdrom\win32\SDL_syscdrom.c (source code zip archive
from your download page), function: SDL_SYS_CDGetTOC(), line 226 where you add
1 to the value for length to fix MCI last track length bug. This may be the
source of the issue (because subtracting 1 from the length seems to resolve the
issue). Microsoft may have patched the referenced bug since you wrote that
line.
Mike Hall
author | Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 14 Mar 2006 05:34:39 +0000 |
parents | d910939febfa |
children | 782fd950bd46 c121d94672cb a1b03ba2fcd0 |
line wrap: on
line source
/* SDL - Simple DirectMedia Layer Copyright (C) 1997-2006 Sam Lantinga This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU Lesser General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA Sam Lantinga slouken@libsdl.org */ #include "SDL_config.h" /* An implementation of condition variables using semaphores and mutexes */ /* This implementation borrows heavily from the BeOS condition variable implementation, written by Christopher Tate and Owen Smith. Thanks! */ #include "SDL_thread.h" struct SDL_cond { SDL_mutex *lock; int waiting; int signals; SDL_sem *wait_sem; SDL_sem *wait_done; }; /* Create a condition variable */ SDL_cond * SDL_CreateCond(void) { SDL_cond *cond; cond = (SDL_cond *) SDL_malloc(sizeof(SDL_cond)); if ( cond ) { cond->lock = SDL_CreateMutex(); cond->wait_sem = SDL_CreateSemaphore(0); cond->wait_done = SDL_CreateSemaphore(0); cond->waiting = cond->signals = 0; if ( ! cond->lock || ! cond->wait_sem || ! cond->wait_done ) { SDL_DestroyCond(cond); cond = NULL; } } else { SDL_OutOfMemory(); } return(cond); } /* Destroy a condition variable */ void SDL_DestroyCond(SDL_cond *cond) { if ( cond ) { if ( cond->wait_sem ) { SDL_DestroySemaphore(cond->wait_sem); } if ( cond->wait_done ) { SDL_DestroySemaphore(cond->wait_done); } if ( cond->lock ) { SDL_DestroyMutex(cond->lock); } SDL_free(cond); } } /* Restart one of the threads that are waiting on the condition variable */ int SDL_CondSignal(SDL_cond *cond) { if ( ! cond ) { SDL_SetError("Passed a NULL condition variable"); return -1; } /* If there are waiting threads not already signalled, then signal the condition and wait for the thread to respond. */ SDL_LockMutex(cond->lock); if ( cond->waiting > cond->signals ) { ++cond->signals; SDL_SemPost(cond->wait_sem); SDL_UnlockMutex(cond->lock); SDL_SemWait(cond->wait_done); } else { SDL_UnlockMutex(cond->lock); } return 0; } /* Restart all threads that are waiting on the condition variable */ int SDL_CondBroadcast(SDL_cond *cond) { if ( ! cond ) { SDL_SetError("Passed a NULL condition variable"); return -1; } /* If there are waiting threads not already signalled, then signal the condition and wait for the thread to respond. */ SDL_LockMutex(cond->lock); if ( cond->waiting > cond->signals ) { int i, num_waiting; num_waiting = (cond->waiting - cond->signals); cond->signals = cond->waiting; for ( i=0; i<num_waiting; ++i ) { SDL_SemPost(cond->wait_sem); } /* Now all released threads are blocked here, waiting for us. Collect them all (and win fabulous prizes!) :-) */ SDL_UnlockMutex(cond->lock); for ( i=0; i<num_waiting; ++i ) { SDL_SemWait(cond->wait_done); } } else { SDL_UnlockMutex(cond->lock); } return 0; } /* Wait on the condition variable for at most 'ms' milliseconds. The mutex must be locked before entering this function! The mutex is unlocked during the wait, and locked again after the wait. Typical use: Thread A: SDL_LockMutex(lock); while ( ! condition ) { SDL_CondWait(cond); } SDL_UnlockMutex(lock); Thread B: SDL_LockMutex(lock); ... condition = true; ... SDL_UnlockMutex(lock); */ int SDL_CondWaitTimeout(SDL_cond *cond, SDL_mutex *mutex, Uint32 ms) { int retval; if ( ! cond ) { SDL_SetError("Passed a NULL condition variable"); return -1; } /* Obtain the protection mutex, and increment the number of waiters. This allows the signal mechanism to only perform a signal if there are waiting threads. */ SDL_LockMutex(cond->lock); ++cond->waiting; SDL_UnlockMutex(cond->lock); /* Unlock the mutex, as is required by condition variable semantics */ SDL_UnlockMutex(mutex); /* Wait for a signal */ if ( ms == SDL_MUTEX_MAXWAIT ) { retval = SDL_SemWait(cond->wait_sem); } else { retval = SDL_SemWaitTimeout(cond->wait_sem, ms); } /* Let the signaler know we have completed the wait, otherwise the signaler can race ahead and get the condition semaphore if we are stopped between the mutex unlock and semaphore wait, giving a deadlock. See the following URL for details: http://www-classic.be.com/aboutbe/benewsletter/volume_III/Issue40.html */ SDL_LockMutex(cond->lock); if ( cond->signals > 0 ) { /* If we timed out, we need to eat a condition signal */ if ( retval > 0 ) { SDL_SemWait(cond->wait_sem); } /* We always notify the signal thread that we are done */ SDL_SemPost(cond->wait_done); /* Signal handshake complete */ --cond->signals; } --cond->waiting; SDL_UnlockMutex(cond->lock); /* Lock the mutex, as is required by condition variable semantics */ SDL_LockMutex(mutex); return retval; } /* Wait on the condition variable forever */ int SDL_CondWait(SDL_cond *cond, SDL_mutex *mutex) { return SDL_CondWaitTimeout(cond, mutex, SDL_MUTEX_MAXWAIT); }