view docs/man3/SDL_UnlockSurface.3 @ 270:37fa1484f71b

From: "Mattias Engdeg�rd" <f91-men@nada.kth.se> To: slouken@devolution.com Subject: Re: [SDL] Question about SDL_FillRect() I benchmarked with and without clipping UpdateRects and was unable to find any difference on my moderately slow machine. Anyway, I haven't added clipping in this patch, but fixed a couple of bugs and generally cleaned up some of the X11 image code. Most importantly, UpdateRects now checks for both zero height and width. Also, I eliminated the entire code to byteswap X11 images since X11 can do that automatically if you ask it nicely :-)
author Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org>
date Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:02:03 +0000
parents e5bc29de3f0a
children 546f7c1eb755
line wrap: on
line source

.TH "SDL_UnlockSurface" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" 
.SH "NAME"
SDL_UnlockSurface\- Unlocks a previously locked surface\&.
.SH "SYNOPSIS"
.PP
\fB#include "SDL\&.h"
.sp
\fBvoid \fBSDL_UnlockSurface\fP\fR(\fBSDL_Surface *surface\fR);
.SH "DESCRIPTION"
.PP
Surfaces that were previously locked using \fBSDL_LockSurface\fP must be unlocked with \fBSDL_UnlockSurface\fP\&. Surfaces should be unlocked as soon as possible\&.
.PP
It should be noted that since 1\&.1\&.8, surface locks are recursive\&. See \fI\fBSDL_LockSurface\fP\fR\&.
.SH "SEE ALSO"
.PP
\fI\fBSDL_LockSurface\fP\fR
...\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01