Mercurial > sdl-ios-xcode
view test/picture.xbm @ 911:04a403e4ccf5
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 03:15:01 +0100
From: David Symmonds
Subject: SDL Typedef Structs
Hi, Thanks for the SDL libraries, I have been using them for about a year
now and they are really brilliant. One thing that I have just found whilst
using them through C++ (and needing forward declarations) is that when you
typedef structs you sometimes use
typedef struct Name
{
...
}Name;
e.g. SDL_Surface
and other times use
typedef struct
{
...
}Name;
e.g. SDL_Rect
The first type works fine, when I define a header file I can just put
'struct Name;' at the top and use the Name throughout. However, the second
type is harder to use in a header, and I haven't found a way yet, other than
to include 'SDL.h' in the header file (undesirable). Would there be any harm
in changing the definition of SDL_Rect and such like to the second form?
| author | Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org> |
|---|---|
| date | Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:57:40 +0000 |
| parents | 74212992fb08 |
| children |
line wrap: on
line source
#define picture_width 32 #define picture_height 32 static char picture_bits[] = { 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x18, 0x80, 0x01, 0x18, 0x64, 0x6f, 0xf6, 0x26, 0x0a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x50, 0xf2, 0xff, 0xff, 0x4f, 0x14, 0x04, 0x00, 0x28, 0x14, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x28, 0x10, 0x32, 0x00, 0x08, 0x94, 0x03, 0x00, 0x08, 0xf4, 0x04, 0x00, 0x08, 0xb0, 0x08, 0x00, 0x08, 0x34, 0x01, 0x00, 0x28, 0x34, 0x01, 0x00, 0x28, 0x12, 0x00, 0x40, 0x48, 0x12, 0x20, 0xa6, 0x48, 0x14, 0x50, 0x11, 0x29, 0x14, 0x50, 0x48, 0x2a, 0x10, 0x27, 0xac, 0x0e, 0xd4, 0x71, 0xe8, 0x0a, 0x74, 0x20, 0xa8, 0x0a, 0x14, 0x20, 0x00, 0x08, 0x10, 0x50, 0x00, 0x08, 0x14, 0x00, 0x00, 0x28, 0x14, 0x00, 0x00, 0x28, 0xf2, 0xff, 0xff, 0x4f, 0x0a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x50, 0x64, 0x6f, 0xf6, 0x26, 0x18, 0x80, 0x01, 0x18, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00};