Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 03:15:01 +0100 From: David Symmonds Subject: SDL Typedef Structs Hi, Thanks for the SDL libraries, I have been using them for about a year now and they are really brilliant. One thing that I have just found whilst using them through C++ (and needing forward declarations) is that when you typedef structs you sometimes use typedef struct Name { ... }Name; e.g. SDL_Surface and other times use typedef struct { ... }Name; e.g. SDL_Rect The first type works fine, when I define a header file I can just put 'struct Name;' at the top and use the Name throughout. However, the second type is harder to use in a header, and I haven't found a way yet, other than to include 'SDL.h' in the header file (undesirable). Would there be any harm in changing the definition of SDL_Rect and such like to the second form?

.TH "SDL_WM_SetIcon" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:02" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" 
.SH "NAME"
SDL_WM_SetIcon\- Sets the icon for the display window\&.
.SH "SYNOPSIS"
.PP
\fB#include "SDL\&.h"
.sp
\fBvoid \fBSDL_WM_SetIcon\fP\fR(\fBSDL_Surface *icon, Uint8 *mask\fR);
.SH "DESCRIPTION"
.PP
Sets the icon for the display window\&. Win32 icons must be 32x32\&.
.PP
This function must be called before the first call to \fISDL_SetVideoMode\fR\&.
.PP
It takes an \fBicon\fR surface, and a \fBmask\fR in MSB format\&.
.PP
If \fBmask\fR is \fBNULL\fP, the entire icon surface will be used as the icon\&.
.SH "EXAMPLE"
.PP
.nf
\f(CWSDL_WM_SetIcon(SDL_LoadBMP("icon\&.bmp"), NULL);\fR
.fi
.PP
.SH "SEE ALSO"
.PP
\fI\fBSDL_SetVideoMode\fP\fR, \fI\fBSDL_WM_SetCaption\fP\fR
...\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:02