Mercurial > sdl-ios-xcode
view docs/man3/SDL_Flip.3 @ 911:04a403e4ccf5
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 03:15:01 +0100
From: David Symmonds
Subject: SDL Typedef Structs
Hi, Thanks for the SDL libraries, I have been using them for about a year
now and they are really brilliant. One thing that I have just found whilst
using them through C++ (and needing forward declarations) is that when you
typedef structs you sometimes use
typedef struct Name
{
...
}Name;
e.g. SDL_Surface
and other times use
typedef struct
{
...
}Name;
e.g. SDL_Rect
The first type works fine, when I define a header file I can just put
'struct Name;' at the top and use the Name throughout. However, the second
type is harder to use in a header, and I haven't found a way yet, other than
to include 'SDL.h' in the header file (undesirable). Would there be any harm
in changing the definition of SDL_Rect and such like to the second form?
author | Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:57:40 +0000 |
parents | e5bc29de3f0a |
children | 546f7c1eb755 |
line wrap: on
line source
.TH "SDL_Flip" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" .SH "NAME" SDL_Flip\- Swaps screen buffers .SH "SYNOPSIS" .PP \fB#include "SDL\&.h" .sp \fBint \fBSDL_Flip\fP\fR(\fBSDL_Surface *screen\fR); .SH "DESCRIPTION" .PP On hardware that supports double-buffering, this function sets up a flip and returns\&. The hardware will wait for vertical retrace, and then swap video buffers before the next video surface blit or lock will return\&. On hardware that doesn\&'t support double-buffering, this is equivalent to calling \fISDL_UpdateRect\fR\fB(screen, 0, 0, 0, 0)\fR .PP The \fBSDL_DOUBLEBUF\fP flag must have been passed to \fISDL_SetVideoMode\fR, when setting the video mode for this function to perform hardware flipping\&. .SH "RETURN VALUE" .PP This function returns \fB0\fR if successful, or \fB-1\fR if there was an error\&. .SH "SEE ALSO" .PP \fI\fBSDL_SetVideoMode\fP\fR, \fI\fBSDL_UpdateRect\fP\fR, \fI\fBSDL_Surface\fR\fR ...\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01