view docs/man3/SDL_EventState.3 @ 911:04a403e4ccf5

Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 03:15:01 +0100 From: David Symmonds Subject: SDL Typedef Structs Hi, Thanks for the SDL libraries, I have been using them for about a year now and they are really brilliant. One thing that I have just found whilst using them through C++ (and needing forward declarations) is that when you typedef structs you sometimes use typedef struct Name { ... }Name; e.g. SDL_Surface and other times use typedef struct { ... }Name; e.g. SDL_Rect The first type works fine, when I define a header file I can just put 'struct Name;' at the top and use the Name throughout. However, the second type is harder to use in a header, and I haven't found a way yet, other than to include 'SDL.h' in the header file (undesirable). Would there be any harm in changing the definition of SDL_Rect and such like to the second form?
author Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org>
date Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:57:40 +0000
parents e5bc29de3f0a
children 546f7c1eb755
line wrap: on
line source

.TH "SDL_EventState" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 22:59" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" 
.SH "NAME"
SDL_EventState\- This function allows you to set the state of processing certain events\&.
.SH "SYNOPSIS"
.PP
\fB#include "SDL\&.h"
.sp
\fBUint8 \fBSDL_EventState\fP\fR(\fBUint8 type, int state\fR);
.SH "DESCRIPTION"
.PP
This function allows you to set the state of processing certain event \fBtype\fR\&'s\&.
.PP
If \fBstate\fR is set to \fBSDL_IGNORE\fP, that event \fBtype\fR will be automatically dropped from the event queue and will not be filtered\&.
.PP
If \fBstate\fR is set to \fBSDL_ENABLE\fP, that event \fBtype\fR will be processed normally\&.
.PP
If \fBstate\fR is set to \fBSDL_QUERY\fP, \fBSDL_EventState\fP will return the current processing state of the specified event \fBtype\fR\&.
.PP
A list of event \fBtype\fR\&'s can be found in the \fI\fBSDL_Event\fR\fR section\&.
.SH "SEE ALSO"
.PP
\fI\fBSDL_Event\fR\fR
...\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 22:59