Mercurial > pylearn
changeset 1046:f1732269bce8
comment on Olivier's comment
author | Razvan Pascanu <r.pascanu@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:50:13 -0400 |
parents | d57bdd9a9980 |
children | 0464f891129b |
files | doc/v2_planning/learner.txt |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/doc/v2_planning/learner.txt Wed Sep 08 13:43:57 2010 -0400 +++ b/doc/v2_planning/learner.txt Wed Sep 08 13:50:13 2010 -0400 @@ -283,6 +283,17 @@ ... so why not directly call do_x / do_y instead? + +Comment by RP +~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +James correct me if I'm wrong, but I think each instruction has a execute +command. The job of the learner is to traverse the graph and for each edge +that it decides to cross to call the execute of that edge. Maybe James has +something else in mind, but this was my understanding. + + + Just another view/spin on the same idea (Razvan) ================================================