# HG changeset patch
# User Razvan Pascanu <r.pascanu@gmail.com>
# Date 1283968213 14400
# Node ID f1732269bce8ef7f07670b74e4cfe8bd2b546204
# Parent  d57bdd9a998032b90b7082e281497afc0da84bdc
comment on Olivier's comment

diff -r d57bdd9a9980 -r f1732269bce8 doc/v2_planning/learner.txt
--- a/doc/v2_planning/learner.txt	Wed Sep 08 13:43:57 2010 -0400
+++ b/doc/v2_planning/learner.txt	Wed Sep 08 13:50:13 2010 -0400
@@ -283,6 +283,17 @@
     ...
 so why not directly call do_x / do_y instead?
 
+
+Comment by RP
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+James correct me if I'm wrong, but I think each instruction has a execute
+command. The job of the learner is to traverse the graph and for each edge
+that it decides to cross to call the execute of that edge. Maybe James has 
+something else in mind, but this was my understanding.
+
+
+
 Just another view/spin on the same idea (Razvan)
 ================================================