changeset 1218:5d1b5906151c

I did not fully get the argument against what I wrote ..
author Razvan Pascanu <r.pascanu@gmail.com>
date Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:00:39 -0400
parents c0515c0dfef9
children 9fac28d80fb7
files doc/v2_planning/arch_src/plugin_JB_comments_RP.txt
diffstat 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/doc/v2_planning/arch_src/plugin_JB_comments_RP.txt	Wed Sep 22 12:49:41 2010 -0400
+++ b/doc/v2_planning/arch_src/plugin_JB_comments_RP.txt	Wed Sep 22 13:00:39 2010 -0400
@@ -87,4 +87,13 @@
   Consequently, I think I will remove the BUFFER_REPEAT construct since that is
   really an expression masquerading as a control flow statement, and I will
   remove FILT too.
-    
+
+RP asks:
+
+  I understand now the difference between what you wrote and what I had in
+  mind. Though I don't undestand the argument against it. Do you mean to say
+  that writing it the way I proposed implies a much more complicated backbone
+  framework which will take us to long to develop? Or is there something else
+  that you meant ?
+
+