Mercurial > pylearn
changeset 1218:5d1b5906151c
I did not fully get the argument against what I wrote ..
author | Razvan Pascanu <r.pascanu@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:00:39 -0400 |
parents | c0515c0dfef9 |
children | 9fac28d80fb7 |
files | doc/v2_planning/arch_src/plugin_JB_comments_RP.txt |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/doc/v2_planning/arch_src/plugin_JB_comments_RP.txt Wed Sep 22 12:49:41 2010 -0400 +++ b/doc/v2_planning/arch_src/plugin_JB_comments_RP.txt Wed Sep 22 13:00:39 2010 -0400 @@ -87,4 +87,13 @@ Consequently, I think I will remove the BUFFER_REPEAT construct since that is really an expression masquerading as a control flow statement, and I will remove FILT too. - + +RP asks: + + I understand now the difference between what you wrote and what I had in + mind. Though I don't undestand the argument against it. Do you mean to say + that writing it the way I proposed implies a much more complicated backbone + framework which will take us to long to develop? Or is there something else + that you meant ? + +