# HG changeset patch
# User Razvan Pascanu <r.pascanu@gmail.com>
# Date 1285174839 14400
# Node ID 5d1b5906151c603218fe5c35c593f508ef03ff66
# Parent  c0515c0dfef9baf1db8aae57e55cc21bbd70abc1
 I did not fully get the argument against what I wrote ..

diff -r c0515c0dfef9 -r 5d1b5906151c doc/v2_planning/arch_src/plugin_JB_comments_RP.txt
--- a/doc/v2_planning/arch_src/plugin_JB_comments_RP.txt	Wed Sep 22 12:49:41 2010 -0400
+++ b/doc/v2_planning/arch_src/plugin_JB_comments_RP.txt	Wed Sep 22 13:00:39 2010 -0400
@@ -87,4 +87,13 @@
   Consequently, I think I will remove the BUFFER_REPEAT construct since that is
   really an expression masquerading as a control flow statement, and I will
   remove FILT too.
-    
+
+RP asks:
+
+  I understand now the difference between what you wrote and what I had in
+  mind. Though I don't undestand the argument against it. Do you mean to say
+  that writing it the way I proposed implies a much more complicated backbone
+  framework which will take us to long to develop? Or is there something else
+  that you meant ?
+
+