--- a/writeup/nips2010_submission.tex	Sat May 29 15:38:13 2010 -0700
+++ b/writeup/nips2010_submission.tex	Sun May 30 12:04:05 2010 -0400
@@ -416,6 +416,12 @@
 \end{center}
 \end{table}
 
+\begin{figure}[h]
+\resizebox{.99\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{images/error_rates_charts.pdf}}\\
+\caption{Charts corresponding to table \ref{tab:sda-vs-mlp-vs-humans}. Left: overall results; error bars indicate a 95\% confidence interval. Right: error rates on NIST test digits only, with results from litterature. }
+\label{fig:error-rates-charts}
+\end{figure}
+
 \subsection{Perturbed Training Data More Helpful for SDAE}
 
 \begin{table}
@@ -487,6 +493,15 @@
 \end{center}
 \end{table}
 
+
+\begin{figure}[h]
+\resizebox{.99\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{images/improvements_charts.pdf}}\\
+\caption{Charts corresponding to tables \ref{tab:perturbation-effect} (left) and \ref{tab:multi-task} (right).}
+\label{fig:improvements-charts}
+\end{figure}
+
+
+
 \section{Conclusions}
 
 \bibliography{strings,ml,aigaion,specials}