comparison writeup/nips2010_submission.tex @ 475:ead3085c1c66

Added charts to nips2010_submission.tex
author fsavard
date Sun, 30 May 2010 12:04:05 -0400
parents d02d288257bf
children db28764b8252
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
471:0a9600709a9f 475:ead3085c1c66
414 \citep{Migram+al-2005} & & & & 2.1\% $\pm$.12\% \\ \hline 414 \citep{Migram+al-2005} & & & & 2.1\% $\pm$.12\% \\ \hline
415 \end{tabular} 415 \end{tabular}
416 \end{center} 416 \end{center}
417 \end{table} 417 \end{table}
418 418
419 \begin{figure}[h]
420 \resizebox{.99\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{images/error_rates_charts.pdf}}\\
421 \caption{Charts corresponding to table \ref{tab:sda-vs-mlp-vs-humans}. Left: overall results; error bars indicate a 95\% confidence interval. Right: error rates on NIST test digits only, with results from litterature. }
422 \label{fig:error-rates-charts}
423 \end{figure}
424
419 \subsection{Perturbed Training Data More Helpful for SDAE} 425 \subsection{Perturbed Training Data More Helpful for SDAE}
420 426
421 \begin{table} 427 \begin{table}
422 \caption{Relative change in error rates due to the use of perturbed training data, 428 \caption{Relative change in error rates due to the use of perturbed training data,
423 either using NISTP, for the MLP1/SDA1 models, or using P07, for the MLP2/SDA2 models. 429 either using NISTP, for the MLP1/SDA1 models, or using P07, for the MLP2/SDA2 models.
485 SDA-upper & 5.93\% & 6.78\% & 13\% \\ \hline 491 SDA-upper & 5.93\% & 6.78\% & 13\% \\ \hline
486 \end{tabular} 492 \end{tabular}
487 \end{center} 493 \end{center}
488 \end{table} 494 \end{table}
489 495
496
497 \begin{figure}[h]
498 \resizebox{.99\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{images/improvements_charts.pdf}}\\
499 \caption{Charts corresponding to tables \ref{tab:perturbation-effect} (left) and \ref{tab:multi-task} (right).}
500 \label{fig:improvements-charts}
501 \end{figure}
502
503
504
490 \section{Conclusions} 505 \section{Conclusions}
491 506
492 \bibliography{strings,ml,aigaion,specials} 507 \bibliography{strings,ml,aigaion,specials}
493 %\bibliographystyle{plainnat} 508 %\bibliographystyle{plainnat}
494 \bibliographystyle{unsrtnat} 509 \bibliographystyle{unsrtnat}