Mercurial > almixer_isolated

changeset 47:9b772c81b550

Find changesets by keywords (author, files, the commit message), revision number or hash, or revset expression.
Added addition query to get the current number of buffers processed in the new inner buffer decoupling loop because I've been seeing a lot of 59TestingError warnings. I think it is possible the value may become stale after the first iteration of the loop resulting in assumption failures which result in triggering this error. Also changed some // comments to /* */ for C89 compliance.
author Eric Wing <ewing@anscamobile.com>
date Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:33:34 -0700
parents 56855942fdc6
children 00b770b0d2aa
files ALmixer.c
diffstat 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/ALmixer.c	Tue Sep 13 18:03:21 2011 -0700
+++ b/ALmixer.c	Thu Sep 29 11:33:34 2011 -0700
@@ -2689,7 +2689,7 @@
 			ALuint queue_ret_flag;
 			for(k=0; k<data->num_buffers_in_use; k++)
 			{
-//				fprintf(stderr, "56c: CircularQueue_PushBack.\n");
+/*				fprintf(stderr, "56c: CircularQueue_PushBack.\n"); */
 				queue_ret_flag = CircularQueueUnsignedInt_PushBack(data->circular_buffer_queue, data->buffer[k]);
 				if(0 == queue_ret_flag)
 				{
@@ -5276,7 +5276,7 @@
 				 /* WARNING: It looks like Snow Leopard some times crashes on this call under x86_64
 				  * typically when I suffer a lot of buffer underruns.
 				  */
-//				 fprintf(stderr, "calling AL_BUFFERS_PROCESSED on source:%d", ALmixer_Channel_List[i].alsource);
+/*				 fprintf(stderr, "calling AL_BUFFERS_PROCESSED on source:%d", ALmixer_Channel_List[i].alsource); */
 				alGetSourcei(
 					ALmixer_Channel_List[i].alsource,
 					AL_BUFFERS_PROCESSED, &buffers_processed
@@ -5286,7 +5286,7 @@
 					fprintf(stderr, "52Testing error: %s\n",
 						alGetString(error));				
 				}
-//				fprintf(stderr, "finished AL_BUFFERS_PROCESSED, buffers_processed=%d", buffers_processed);
+/*				fprintf(stderr, "finished AL_BUFFERS_PROCESSED, buffers_processed=%d", buffers_processed); */
 
  /* WTF!!! The Nvidia distribution is failing on the alGetSourcei(source, AL_BUFFER, buf_id) call.
  * I need this call to figure out which buffer OpenAL is currently playing. 
@@ -5483,7 +5483,7 @@
 				if(AL_STOPPED == state)
 				{
 					number_of_buffers_to_queue_this_pass = ALmixer_Channel_List[i].almixer_data->num_startup_buffers;
-//					fprintf(stderr, "assuming underrun condition, using num_startup_buffers=%d\n", number_of_buffers_to_queue_this_pass);
+/*					fprintf(stderr, "assuming underrun condition, using num_startup_buffers=%d\n", number_of_buffers_to_queue_this_pass); */
 				}	
 
 				/* Don't bother to check to make sure the number_of_buffers_to_queue_this_pass does not exceed the maximum number of buffers because of the logic hack bug. */
@@ -5497,7 +5497,25 @@
 				}
 				for(current_count_of_buffer_queue_passes=0; current_count_of_buffer_queue_passes<number_of_buffers_to_queue_this_pass; current_count_of_buffer_queue_passes++)
 				{
-//					fprintf(stderr, "current_count_of_buffer_queue_passes:%d\n",  current_count_of_buffer_queue_passes);
+/*					fprintf(stderr, "current_count_of_buffer_queue_passes:%d\n",  current_count_of_buffer_queue_passes); */
+
+					/* Because I introduced this for-loop, I think I need to regrab the number of processed buffers because
+					 * the number may now be stale from previous iterations. I suppose I could do it at the end of the loop,
+					 * but the logic flow is already too complicated to ensure that the block is being hit.
+					 */
+					/* Get the number of buffers processed
+					*/
+					alGetSourcei(
+						ALmixer_Channel_List[i].alsource,
+						AL_BUFFERS_PROCESSED, 
+						&buffers_processed
+					);
+					if((error = alGetError()) != AL_NO_ERROR)
+					{
+						fprintf(stderr, "59aTestingError, Can't get buffers_processed: %s\n",
+							alGetString(error));				
+					}
+					
 
 					/* For this to work, we must rely on EVERYTHING
 					 * else to unset the EOF if there is looping.
@@ -5918,7 +5936,7 @@
 							if(ALmixer_Channel_List[i].almixer_data->circular_buffer_queue != NULL)
 							{
 								ALuint queue_ret_flag;
-	//				fprintf(stderr, "56d: CircularQueue_PushBack.\n");
+	/* 				fprintf(stderr, "56d: CircularQueue_PushBack.\n"); */
 								queue_ret_flag = CircularQueueUnsignedInt_PushBack(
 									ALmixer_Channel_List[i].almixer_data->circular_buffer_queue, 
 									ALmixer_Channel_List[i].almixer_data->buffer[ALmixer_Channel_List[i].almixer_data->num_buffers_in_use]
@@ -5966,7 +5984,7 @@
 							if(ALmixer_Channel_List[i].almixer_data->circular_buffer_queue != NULL)
 							{
 								ALuint queue_ret_flag;
-	//				fprintf(stderr, "56e: CircularQueue_PushBack.\n");
+	/* 				fprintf(stderr, "56e: CircularQueue_PushBack.\n"); */
 								queue_ret_flag = CircularQueueUnsignedInt_PushBack(
 									ALmixer_Channel_List[i].almixer_data->circular_buffer_queue, 
 									unqueued_buffer_id
@@ -7737,7 +7755,7 @@
 	}
 	va_list argp;
 	va_start(argp, err_str);
-	// SDL_SetError which I'm emulating has no number parameter.
+	/* SDL_SetError which I'm emulating has no number parameter. */
 	TError_SetErrorv(s_ALmixerErrorPool, 1, err_str, argp);
 	va_end(argp);
 }
@@ -8268,7 +8286,7 @@
 						free(ret_data->buffer_map_list[j].data);
 						j--;
 					}
-					// Delete for j=0 because the while loop misses the last one
+					/* Delete for j=0 because the while loop misses the last one */
 					free(ret_data->buffer_map_list[j].data);
 
 					free(ret_data->buffer_map_list);