Fixed bug #176 [I'm fixing this for the public headers, but I'm not going to bother for the SDL library code (yet)] To clarify: Normaly, GCC (or, to be precise, the preprocessor) will ignore this, and compile the code happily. However, one can specify -Wundef to get a warning about this. One can probably argue whether to consider this a bug or not; but I think that (a) from a semantic point of view, using "#if FOO" when FOO is not defined is strange, and (b) since it is possible to trigger a warning about this, and a trivial fix exists, it should be corrected. I can think of two alternative patches, BTW: 1) Simply use #define HAVE_FOO 0, instead of not defining HAVE_FOO at all 2) Change #if HAVE_FOO to #if HAVE_FOO+0 which always does the right thing. But I think I still prefer the attached patch :-).

.TH "SDL_JoystickName" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:00" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" 
.SH "NAME"
SDL_JoystickName\- Get joystick name\&.
.SH "SYNOPSIS"
.PP
\fB#include "SDL\&.h"
.sp
\fBconst char *\fBSDL_JoystickName\fP\fR(\fBint index\fR);
.SH "DESCRIPTION"
.PP
Get the implementation dependent name of joystick\&. The \fBindex\fR parameter refers to the N\&'th joystick on the system\&.
.SH "RETURN VALUE"
.PP
Returns a char pointer to the joystick name\&.
.SH "EXAMPLES"
.PP
.PP
.nf
\f(CW/* Print the names of all attached joysticks */
int num_joy, i;
num_joy=SDL_NumJoysticks();
printf("%d joysticks found
", num_joy);
for(i=0;i<num_joy;i++)
  printf("%s
", SDL_JoystickName(i));\fR
.fi
.PP
.SH "SEE ALSO"
.PP
\fI\fBSDL_JoystickOpen\fP\fR
...\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:00