Fixed bug #176 [I'm fixing this for the public headers, but I'm not going to bother for the SDL library code (yet)] To clarify: Normaly, GCC (or, to be precise, the preprocessor) will ignore this, and compile the code happily. However, one can specify -Wundef to get a warning about this. One can probably argue whether to consider this a bug or not; but I think that (a) from a semantic point of view, using "#if FOO" when FOO is not defined is strange, and (b) since it is possible to trigger a warning about this, and a trivial fix exists, it should be corrected. I can think of two alternative patches, BTW: 1) Simply use #define HAVE_FOO 0, instead of not defining HAVE_FOO at all 2) Change #if HAVE_FOO to #if HAVE_FOO+0 which always does the right thing. But I think I still prefer the attached patch :-).

.TH "SDL_Delay" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" 
.SH "NAME"
SDL_Delay\- Wait a specified number of milliseconds before returning\&.
.SH "SYNOPSIS"
.PP
\fB#include "SDL\&.h"
.sp
\fBvoid \fBSDL_Delay\fP\fR(\fBUint32 ms\fR);
.SH "DESCRIPTION"
.PP
Wait a specified number of milliseconds before returning\&. \fBSDL_Delay\fP will wait at \fIleast\fP the specified time, but possible longer due to OS scheduling\&.
.PP
.RS
\fBNote:  
.PP
Count on a delay granularity of \fIat least\fP 10 ms\&. Some platforms have shorter clock ticks but this is the most common\&.
.RE
.SH "SEE ALSO"
.PP
\fI\fBSDL_AddTimer\fP\fR
...\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01