Fixed bug #176 [I'm fixing this for the public headers, but I'm not going to bother for the SDL library code (yet)] To clarify: Normaly, GCC (or, to be precise, the preprocessor) will ignore this, and compile the code happily. However, one can specify -Wundef to get a warning about this. One can probably argue whether to consider this a bug or not; but I think that (a) from a semantic point of view, using "#if FOO" when FOO is not defined is strange, and (b) since it is possible to trigger a warning about this, and a trivial fix exists, it should be corrected. I can think of two alternative patches, BTW: 1) Simply use #define HAVE_FOO 0, instead of not defining HAVE_FOO at all 2) Change #if HAVE_FOO to #if HAVE_FOO+0 which always does the right thing. But I think I still prefer the attached patch :-).

.TH "SDL_CreateThread" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:00" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" 
.SH "NAME"
SDL_CreateThread\- Creates a new thread of execution that shares its parent\&'s properties\&.
.SH "SYNOPSIS"
.PP
\fB#include "SDL\&.h"
#include "SDL_thread\&.h"
.sp
\fBSDL_Thread *\fBSDL_CreateThread\fP\fR(\fBint (*fn)(void *), void *data\fR);
.SH "DESCRIPTION"
.PP
\fBSDL_CreateThread\fP creates a new thread of execution that shares all of its parent\&'s global memory, signal handlers, file descriptors, etc, and runs the function \fBfn\fR passed the void pointer \fBdata\fR The thread quits when this function returns\&.
.SH "SEE ALSO"
.PP
\fI\fBSDL_KillThread\fP\fR
...\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:00