Mercurial > sdl-ios-xcode
view docs/man3/SDL_VideoInfo.3 @ 983:7f08bd66f1ca
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 06:23:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Eric Wing
Subject: OS X Mouse inversion problem fix (again)
Here's yet another patch for the OS X mouse inversion
problem. This should fix the problem once and for all.
I know I've said this before, but *This time for
sure!* :)
If you recall, my last patch broke the non-OpenGL
windowed code and caused the inversion to occur there
instead. Max submitted a patch that partially reverted
the changes back which included the os version hack
which is currently the most recent CVS.
Aaron Sullivan identified and reported to the mailing
list the other day, that the last partial regression
of the code broke OS X 10.2. Looking over the results,
I'm thinking that I was slightly more successful than
I thought at unifying the code. I think I was trying
to unify the code base for OpenGL and non-OpenGL
windowed modes for all versions of the OS. It looks
like I failed at at unifying the OpenGL and non-OpenGL
code, but I did succeed at unifying the OS versions.
Thus, we no longer need the hack for the OS version
checks. The partial regression still included an OS
check which is what broke things for < 10.3.
Attached is the patch for SDL_QuartzWM.m. It basically
is a half-line change that removes one of the two
checks that decides if the mouse coordinates need to
be inverted, i.e:
if (system_version >= 0x1030 &&
(SDL_VideoSurface->flags & SDL_OPENGL) )
becomes this:
if(SDL_VideoSurface->flags & SDL_OPENGL)
With Aaron's outstanding help, we have collectively
tested:
windowed OpenGL
windowed non-OpenGL
fullscreen OpenGL
fullscreen non-OpenGL
under OS X 10.2 (Jaguar), 10.3 (Panther), and 10.4
(Tiger).
We don't have access to 10.0 or 10.1, but since the
original problem didn't materialize until 10.3, I'm
hopeful that testing 10.2 is sufficient. And now that
the code is uniform, I'm also hoping we'll be safe
moving forward to deal with future revisions of the OS
with this issue.
author | Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:57:47 +0000 |
parents | e5bc29de3f0a |
children | 546f7c1eb755 |
line wrap: on
line source
.TH "SDL_VideoInfo" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" .SH "NAME" SDL_VideoInfo\- Video Target information .SH "STRUCTURE DEFINITION" .PP .nf \f(CWtypedef struct{ Uint32 hw_available:1; Uint32 wm_available:1; Uint32 blit_hw:1; Uint32 blit_hw_CC:1; Uint32 blit_hw_A:1; Uint32 blit_sw:1; Uint32 blit_sw_CC:1; Uint32 blit_sw_A:1; Uint32 blit_fill; Uint32 video_mem; SDL_PixelFormat *vfmt; } SDL_VideoInfo;\fR .fi .PP .SH "STRUCTURE DATA" .TP 20 \fBhw_available\fR Is it possible to create hardware surfaces? .TP 20 \fBwm_available\fR Is there a window manager available .TP 20 \fBblit_hw\fR Are hardware to hardware blits accelerated? .TP 20 \fBblit_hw_CC\fR Are hardware to hardware colorkey blits accelerated? .TP 20 \fBblit_hw_A\fR Are hardware to hardware alpha blits accelerated? .TP 20 \fBblit_sw\fR Are software to hardware blits accelerated? .TP 20 \fBblit_sw_CC\fR Are software to hardware colorkey blits accelerated? .TP 20 \fBblit_sw_A\fR Are software to hardware alpha blits accelerated? .TP 20 \fBblit_fill\fR Are color fills accelerated? .TP 20 \fBvideo_mem\fR Total amount of video memory in Kilobytes .TP 20 \fBvfmt\fR \fIPixel format\fR of the video device .SH "DESCRIPTION" .PP This (read-only) structure is returned by \fI\fBSDL_GetVideoInfo\fP\fR\&. It contains information on either the \&'best\&' available mode (if called before \fI\fBSDL_SetVideoMode\fP\fR) or the current video mode\&. .SH "SEE ALSO" .PP \fI\fBSDL_PixelFormat\fR\fR, \fI\fBSDL_GetVideoInfo\fP\fR ...\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 23:01