Mercurial > sdl-ios-xcode
view docs/man3/SDL_QuitEvent.3 @ 614:0b4c3f5ff63d
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:21:33 -0230
From: Stephen Anthony <stephena@roadrunner.nf.net>
Subject: [SDL] First patch concerning 4.3 and refresh rates
OK, here's my first draft of the patch for the above subject.
A short explanation:
X 4.3 introduces many more modelines than older versions. This would be
fine, except it introduces many modes with the *same* resolution but
different refresh rates. And SDL won't necessarily pick the one with the
highest refresh rate.
So this patch restores SDL to X 4.2 functionality. That is, there is only
ever one refresh rate *per* resolution, and it is the highest possible.
This functionality can be totally disabled by using the environment
variable 'SDL_VIDEO_X11_USE_ALL_MODES' set equal to 1.
author | Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 20 Apr 2003 05:36:52 +0000 |
parents | e5bc29de3f0a |
children | 546f7c1eb755 |
line wrap: on
line source
.TH "SDL_QuitEvent" "3" "Tue 11 Sep 2001, 22:59" "SDL" "SDL API Reference" .SH "NAME" SDL_QuitEvent\- Quit requested event .SH "STRUCTURE DEFINITION" .PP .nf \f(CWtypedef struct{ Uint8 type } SDL_QuitEvent;\fR .fi .PP .SH "STRUCTURE DATA" .TP 20 \fBtype\fR \fBSDL_QUIT\fP .SH "DESCRIPTION" .PP \fBSDL_QuitEvent\fR is a member of the \fI\fBSDL_Event\fR\fR union and is used whan an event of type \fBSDL_QUIT\fP is reported\&. .PP As can be seen, the SDL_QuitEvent structure serves no useful purpose\&. The event itself, on the other hand, is very important\&. If you filter out or ignore a quit event then it is impossible for the user to close the window\&. On the other hand, if you do accept a quit event then the application window will be closed, and screen updates will still report success event though the application will no longer be visible\&. .PP .RS \fBNote: .PP The macro \fBSDL_QuitRequested\fP will return non-zero if a quit event is pending .RE .SH "SEE ALSO" .PP \fI\fBSDL_Event\fR\fR, \fI\fBSDL_SetEventFilter\fP\fR ...\" created by instant / docbook-to-man, Tue 11 Sep 2001, 22:59