Mercurial > sdl-ios-xcode
view test/testcpuinfo.c @ 911:04a403e4ccf5
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 03:15:01 +0100
From: David Symmonds
Subject: SDL Typedef Structs
Hi, Thanks for the SDL libraries, I have been using them for about a year
now and they are really brilliant. One thing that I have just found whilst
using them through C++ (and needing forward declarations) is that when you
typedef structs you sometimes use
typedef struct Name
{
...
}Name;
e.g. SDL_Surface
and other times use
typedef struct
{
...
}Name;
e.g. SDL_Rect
The first type works fine, when I define a header file I can just put
'struct Name;' at the top and use the Name throughout. However, the second
type is harder to use in a header, and I haven't found a way yet, other than
to include 'SDL.h' in the header file (undesirable). Would there be any harm
in changing the definition of SDL_Rect and such like to the second form?
author | Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:57:40 +0000 (2004-07-18) |
parents | ca06a994f03c |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
/* Test program to check SDL's CPU feature detection */ #include <stdio.h> #include "SDL.h" #include "SDL_cpuinfo.h" int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { printf("RDTSC %s\n", SDL_HasRDTSC() ? "detected" : "not detected"); printf("MMX %s\n", SDL_HasMMX() ? "detected" : "not detected"); printf("MMX Ext %s\n", SDL_HasMMXExt() ? "detected" : "not detected"); printf("3DNow %s\n", SDL_Has3DNow() ? "detected" : "not detected"); printf("3DNow Ext %s\n", SDL_Has3DNowExt() ? "detected" : "not detected"); printf("SSE %s\n", SDL_HasSSE() ? "detected" : "not detected"); printf("SSE2 %s\n", SDL_HasSSE2() ? "detected" : "not detected"); printf("AltiVec %s\n", SDL_HasAltiVec() ? "detected" : "not detected"); return(0); }