view test/testcpuinfo.c @ 911:04a403e4ccf5

Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 03:15:01 +0100 From: David Symmonds Subject: SDL Typedef Structs Hi, Thanks for the SDL libraries, I have been using them for about a year now and they are really brilliant. One thing that I have just found whilst using them through C++ (and needing forward declarations) is that when you typedef structs you sometimes use typedef struct Name { ... }Name; e.g. SDL_Surface and other times use typedef struct { ... }Name; e.g. SDL_Rect The first type works fine, when I define a header file I can just put 'struct Name;' at the top and use the Name throughout. However, the second type is harder to use in a header, and I haven't found a way yet, other than to include 'SDL.h' in the header file (undesirable). Would there be any harm in changing the definition of SDL_Rect and such like to the second form?
author Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org>
date Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:57:40 +0000 (2004-07-18)
parents ca06a994f03c
children
line wrap: on
line source

/* Test program to check SDL's CPU feature detection */

#include <stdio.h>

#include "SDL.h"
#include "SDL_cpuinfo.h"

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
	printf("RDTSC %s\n", SDL_HasRDTSC() ? "detected" : "not detected");
	printf("MMX %s\n", SDL_HasMMX() ? "detected" : "not detected");
	printf("MMX Ext %s\n", SDL_HasMMXExt() ? "detected" : "not detected");
	printf("3DNow %s\n", SDL_Has3DNow() ? "detected" : "not detected");
	printf("3DNow Ext %s\n", SDL_Has3DNowExt() ? "detected" : "not detected");
	printf("SSE %s\n", SDL_HasSSE() ? "detected" : "not detected");
	printf("SSE2 %s\n", SDL_HasSSE2() ? "detected" : "not detected");
	printf("AltiVec %s\n", SDL_HasAltiVec() ? "detected" : "not detected");
	return(0);
}