--- a/doc/v2_planning/architecture.txt	Tue Sep 14 13:33:45 2010 -0400
+++ b/doc/v2_planning/architecture.txt	Tue Sep 14 13:41:48 2010 -0400
@@ -3,13 +3,13 @@
 ====================
 
 
-Basic Design Approach
-=====================
+SE + VM Approach
+=================
 
-I propose that the basic design of the library follow the Symbolic Expression
-(SE) structure + virtual machine (VM) pattern that worked for Theano.
+One avenue for the basic design of the library is to follow the Symbolic
+Expression (SE) structure + virtual machine (VM) pattern that worked for Theano.
 
-So the main things for the library to provide would be:
+The main things for the library to provide would be:
 
 - a few VMs, some of which can run programs in parallel across processors,
   hosts, and networks [R6,R8];
@@ -109,3 +109,22 @@
 convert it into the pipeline given in the linear version. It's still possible
 though, but this is probably not the place to get into the details.
 
+
+
+Jobman Compatibility Approach
+=============================
+
+One basic approach for the library is to provide a set of components that are
+compatible with remote execution.  The emphasis could be not so much on
+standardizing the roles and APIs of components, so much as ensuring that they
+can be glued together and supports parallel execution on one or more CPUs or
+clusters.
+
+In this approach we would provide a proxy for asynchronous execution
+(e.g. "pylearn.call(fn, args, kwargs, backend=default_backend)"), which would
+come with constraints on what fn, args, and kwargs can be.  Specifically, they
+must be picklable, and there are benefits (e.g. automatic function call caching)
+associated with their being hashable as well.
+
+
+