Mercurial > pylearn
comparison doc/v2_planning/architecture.txt @ 1153:ae5ba6206fd3
a first draft of pseudo-code for logreg .. using version B (?) approach
author | Razvan Pascanu <r.pascanu@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:34:30 -0400 |
parents | 40c1461ce9ef |
children | f111f8c2a280 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
1152:0904dd74894d | 1153:ae5ba6206fd3 |
---|---|
114 (*) Note that I cheated a bit in my example above: the graph from the | 114 (*) Note that I cheated a bit in my example above: the graph from the |
115 encapsulated version is not a simple chain, so it is not obvious how to | 115 encapsulated version is not a simple chain, so it is not obvious how to |
116 convert it into the pipeline given in the linear version. It's still possible | 116 convert it into the pipeline given in the linear version. It's still possible |
117 though, but this is probably not the place to get into the details. | 117 though, but this is probably not the place to get into the details. |
118 | 118 |
119 RP comment : The way I see it, you could always have everything using the | |
120 encapsulation paradigm ( which as you pointed out is a bit more powerful) and | |
121 then have linear shortcuts ( functions that take a list of functions and some | |
122 inputs and apply them in some order). You will not be able to have a one case | |
123 cover all pipeline function, but I think it is sufficient to offer such | |
124 options (linear functions) for a few widely used cases .. | |
119 | 125 |
120 | 126 |
121 Jobman Compatibility Approach | 127 Jobman Compatibility Approach |
122 ============================= | 128 ============================= |
123 | 129 |