Mercurial > pylearn
comparison doc/v2_planning/architecture.txt @ 1126:7ba1854f03e7
YB: comment on lambdas vs API for architecture.txt
author | Yoshua Bengio <bengioy@iro.umontreal.ca> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:49:48 -0400 |
parents | 5387666d49b4 |
children | 40c1461ce9ef |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
1125:5387666d49b4 | 1126:7ba1854f03e7 |
---|---|
59 | 59 |
60 YB: I agree that lambdas are more flexible, but from the user's point of | 60 YB: I agree that lambdas are more flexible, but from the user's point of |
61 view it is really important to know what can swap with what, so that they | 61 view it is really important to know what can swap with what, so that they |
62 can easily plug-and-play. So even if informal, something in the spirit | 62 can easily plug-and-play. So even if informal, something in the spirit |
63 of an API must be described somewhere, and components should declare | 63 of an API must be described somewhere, and components should declare |
64 either formally or through comments what functionality 'type' they can take on. | 64 either formally or through comments what functionality 'type' |
65 they can take on. | |
65 | 66 |
66 Encapsulation vs. linearity | 67 Encapsulation vs. linearity |
67 --------------------------- | 68 --------------------------- |
68 | 69 |
69 A while ago, the Apstat crew went to fight "encapsulation" to propose instead | 70 A while ago, the Apstat crew went to fight "encapsulation" to propose instead |