--- a/writeup/nips_rebuttal_clean.txt	Sat Aug 07 22:56:46 2010 -0400
+++ b/writeup/nips_rebuttal_clean.txt	Sun Aug 08 08:16:21 2010 -0400
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 
 Reviewer_5 about semi-supervised learning: In the unsupervised phase, no labels are used. In the supervised fine-tuning phase, all labels are used.  So this is *not* the semi-supervised setting, which was already previously studied [5], showing the advantage of depth. Instead, we focus here on the out-of-distribution aspect of self-taught learning.
 
-"...human errors may be present...": Indeed, there are variations across human labelings, which have have estimated (since each character was viewed by 3 different humans), and reported in the paper (the standard deviations across humans are large, but the standard error across a large test set is very small, so we believe the average error numbers to be fairly accurate).
+"...human errors may be present...": Indeed, there are variations across human labelings, which have been estimated (since each character was viewed by 3 different humans), and reported in the paper (the standard deviations across humans are large, but the standard error across a large test set is very small, so we believe the average error numbers to be fairly accurate).
 
 "...supplement, but I did not have access to it...": strange!  We could (and still can) access it. We will include a complete pseudo-code of SDAs in it.