# HG changeset patch
# User Yoshua Bengio <bengioy@iro.umontreal.ca>
# Date 1275054494 21600
# Node ID 9609c5cf9b6ba531603449418d797d7ec1082130
# Parent  fe292653a0f8fb9640abbd2d2180948455402539
lit. results

diff -r fe292653a0f8 -r 9609c5cf9b6b writeup/techreport.tex
--- a/writeup/techreport.tex	Thu May 27 21:53:24 2010 -0600
+++ b/writeup/techreport.tex	Fri May 28 07:48:14 2010 -0600
@@ -380,7 +380,8 @@
 \{SDA,MLP\}0 are trained on NIST,
 \{SDA,MLP\}1 are trained on NISTP, and \{SDA,MLP\}2 are trained on P07.
 The human error rate on digits is a lower bound because it does not count digits that were
-recognized as letters.}
+recognized as letters. For comparison, the results found in the literature
+on NIST digits classification using the same test set are included.}
 \label{tab:sda-vs-mlp-vs-humans}
 \begin{center}
 \begin{tabular}{|l|r|r|r|r|} \hline
@@ -392,6 +393,10 @@
 MLP0   &  24.2\% $\pm$.15\%  & 68.8\%$\pm$.33\%  & 78.70\%$\pm$.14\%  & 3.45\% $\pm$.15\% \\ \hline 
 MLP1   &  23.0\% $\pm$.15\%  &  41.8\%$\pm$.35\%  & 90.4\%$\pm$.1\%  & 3.85\% $\pm$.16\% \\ \hline 
 MLP2   &  24.3\% $\pm$.15\%  &  46.0\%$\pm$.35\%  & 54.7\%$\pm$.17\%  & 4.85\% $\pm$.18\% \\ \hline 
+[5]    &                     &                    &                   & 4.95\% $\pm$.18\% \\ \hline
+[2]    &                     &                    &                   & 3.71\% $\pm$.16\% \\ \hline
+[3]    &                     &                    &                   & 2.4\% $\pm$.13\% \\ \hline
+[4]    &                     &                    &                   & 2.1\% $\pm$.12\% \\ \hline
 \end{tabular}
 \end{center}
 \end{table}